On Tue, 26 May 2009, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Carl Mäsak wrote:
In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do
literate
programing for anyone who is interested.
What do you think?
That it sounds like a good idea for a sublanguage-extending module.
I'm not familiar with t
I think the equivalent of tangle/weave would take docs designed for
literate reading and produce the runable file. Perl doesn't have to
execute it directly. But that can be automated using a source filter.
Daniel Carrera daniel.carrera-at-theingots.org |Perl 6| wrote:
Hello,
I really like P
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Carrera
wrote:
> In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do literate
> programing for anyone who is interested.
>
> What do you think?
The main literate programming feature that's missing from POD is the
ability to scramble the orde
Carl Mäsak wrote:
In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do literate
programing for anyone who is interested.
What do you think?
That it sounds like a good idea for a sublanguage-extending module.
I'm not familiar with those. Are they hard to make? I guess that it i
Daniel (>):
> [...]
>
> In this way, a relatively simple change makes Perl 6 Pod able to do literate
> programing for anyone who is interested.
>
> What do you think?
That it sounds like a good idea for a sublanguage-extending module.
// Carl
Hello,
I really like POD and I like the changes in the upcoming Perl 6 Pod.
Have you ever heard of literate programing? (see Wikipedia). I think it
would be neat if Pod could do literate programing. It is already very
close. For reference, please see this article:
For reference, please see
