On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 01:50 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have been trying to examine the i386 code generator to see how
> >> feasible it would be to create an AMD64 code generator.
[...]
> I'm going to copy the i386 path to an a64 path
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you. The POD is a little thick, and I'll be printing it out so I can
> follow along. I'm going to copy the i386 path to an a64 path and have at it.
> I'm hoping it won't be much of a stretch to get 64-bit code generated --
> although REASONABL
Quoting Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been trying to examine the i386 code generator to see how
feasible it would be to create an AMD64 code generator.
Unfortunately, the code is uncommented, and I haven't yet found any
documentation to exp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been trying to examine the i386 code generator to see how
> feasible it would be to create an AMD64 code generator.
> Unfortunately, the code is uncommented, and I haven't yet found any
> documentation to explain how it works on Parrot. So far
I have been trying to examine the i386 code generator to see how feasible it
would be to create an AMD64 code generator. Unfortunately, the code is
uncommented, and I haven't yet found any documentation to explain how it works
on Parrot. So far I've determined there's relevant stuff in jit/i386.
