Hi,
I found I send this mail only to Patrick, but thought I send it to list too.
I still have question about ? and result Match object.
Patrick do not answer, mb some one can say what I miss? or this is bug?
Forward:
Patrick,
I read you post in blog about Z, so if I understand right for do [0],
Patrick (>), Илья (>>):
>> grammar G {
>> token TOP { ^ + $ };
>> token foo { ':' ? };
>> token bar { \w };
>> };
>>
>> ":a:b" ~~ G::TOP;
>>
>> say ~$/; #:a
>>
>> # why ':a'? why not just 'a'?
>
> $/ is an array of Match objects, and Parrot currently
> doesn't distinguish between array
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 05:57:07PM +1000, Илья wrote:
> Hi there,
> I have tried to fix our HTML::Template in November which is blocked by
> Rakudo segaful.
> I was trying to create simple example, but can`t reproduce it. By the
> way now I have short
> example(much shorter then when I start), and
Hi there,
I have tried to fix our HTML::Template in November which is blocked by
Rakudo segaful.
I was trying to create simple example, but can`t reproduce it. By the
way now I have short
example(much shorter then when I start), and I have questions about it:
grammar G {
token TOP { ^ + $ };
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 04:43:55PM +0100, Alberto Simões wrote:
> Hi
>
> Today in #parrot a question was done:
>
> rule foo { * }
>
> should be considered:
>
> rule foo { * }
>
> or
>
> rule foo { ()* }
In the past we've always gone with the former.
If is also a rule, then it presuma
Hi
Today in #parrot a question was done:
rule foo { * }
should be considered:
rule foo { * }
or
rule foo { ()* }
?
Cheers
Alberto
--
Alberto Simões - Departamento de Informática - Universidade do Minho
Campus de Gualtar - 4710-057 Braga - Portugal
"Beware of bugs
