David Golden wrote:
Adam Kennedy wrote:
And therein lies the problem.
Working out when a dependency is important and when it's useless, or
vanity, or lazyness (good or bad) or whatever requires a human
judgment call.
So we can't really do anything about it.
Is it OK to use a lot of depende
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:42:58 +0100, Tels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am still considering building something[0] that shows the
> module-dependency as a graph to show how "bad" the problem has become.
> Even "simple" modules like YAML seem to include everything and the
> kitchen-
Adam Kennedy wrote:
And therein lies the problem.
Working out when a dependency is important and when it's useless, or
vanity, or lazyness (good or bad) or whatever requires a human judgment
call.
So we can't really do anything about it.
Is it OK to use a lot of dependencies if they all wor
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Tels wrote:
On Thursday 26 January 2006 15:26, Thomas Klausner wrote:
I just uploaded Module::CPANTS::Analyse to CPAN. MCA contains most of
the previous Kwalitee indicators and some code to check if one
distribution tarbal
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Tels wrote:
On Thursday 26 January 2006 15:26, Thomas Klausner wrote:
I just uploaded Module::CPANTS::Analyse to CPAN. MCA contains most of
the previous Kwalitee indicators and some code to check if one
distribution tarbal
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 15:26, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > I just uploaded Module::CPANTS::Analyse to CPAN. MCA contains most of
> > the previous Kwalitee indicators and some code to check if one
> > distribution tarball conforms to those i
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 03:42:58PM +0100, Tels wrote:
>
> I am still considering building something[0] that shows the
> module-dependency as a graph to show how "bad" the problem has become.
>
> [0] As soon as I can extract the nec. data from CPANTS, which has failed
> the last two times I tri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tels wrote:
>
> However, I am _really really_ starting to wonder whether we need a
> Kwalitee rating based on *excessive usage of prerequisites*.
Doing work based on existing CPAN modules instead of reinventing the
wheel by oneself is typically *bene
Moin,
On Thursday 26 January 2006 15:26, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I finally found some tuits to work on CPANTS again. As the previous
> implementation had some drawbacks, I started from scratch, and from
> another direction.
>
> I just uploaded Module::CPANTS::Analyse to CPAN. MCA contains
Hi!
I finally found some tuits to work on CPANTS again. As the previous
implementation had some drawbacks, I started from scratch, and from
another direction.
I just uploaded Module::CPANTS::Analyse to CPAN. MCA contains most of
the previous Kwalitee indicators and some code to check if one
distr
10 matches
Mail list logo
