"Michael Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm glad you made that point. If I understand your statement, it's a
> common "gain" cited by Perl 6 (actually Parrot) advocates: you can mix
> languages. But a point I was trying to make was that while this is fun
> for us developers, managers hate i
Hi Affijn,
As I gradually learn how Parrot works, I see that perhaps the idea of
decompiling byte-code into language ___ is only a pipe-dream. But the
point still remains--using the fact that one *could* mix languages X,
Y, and P into your company's source tree is a very weak argument for
Parrot/
Hi Steffen,
I'm glad you made that point. If I understand your statement, it's a
common "gain" cited by Perl 6 (actually Parrot) advocates: you can mix
languages. But a point I was trying to make was that while this is fun
for us developers, managers hate it, with very good reason. Having one
cru
