Re: Fwd: [demerphq@gmail.com: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-07-01 Thread demerphq
On 7/1/05, Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/1/05, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > is_deeply() is not about exact equivalence. Its about making a best fit > > function for the most common uses. I think most people expect [$a, $a] and > > [$b,$c] to come out equal. > >

Re: Fwd: [demerphq@gmail.com: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-06-30 Thread demerphq
On 7/1/05, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The question you have to ask yourself is why should a reference be > treated different from any other value? It is a VALUE. > IE: why should In the following part i meant to make it more clear: by changing this line > > $x=1;$y=2;$z=3; to $

Fwd: [demerphq@gmail.com: Re: fixing is_deeply]

2005-06-30 Thread Michael G Schwern
Yves has some controversial ideas about what is and is not data structure equivalence. I'd like comments on it. - Forwarded message from demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:17:19 +0200 To: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj