On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:39:18PM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> On 12/12/2002 8:07 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
> > Ordinarily you'd test for subs with one of
> >
> > exists &Main::foo
> > &Main::foo.exists
> I thought that was now spelt exists %Main::{&foo} -- that the symbol
> tables were now
On 12/12/2002 8:07 PM, Larry Wall wrote:
Ordinarily you'd test for subs with one of
exists &Main::foo
&Main::foo.exists
I thought that was now spelt exists %Main::{&foo} -- that the symbol
tables were now just plain hashes? (And what's the methody syntax for
testing for hashkey exista
