At 10:01 AM -0500 6/4/03, Garrett Goebel wrote:
From: Graham Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may be missing something here. But within the resources of
an object may be other PMCs. As those PMCs will not be referenced
from anywhere else what is to stop the DoD run from freeing those
before it
From: Graham Barr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I may be missing something here. But within the resources of
> an object may be other PMCs. As those PMCs will not be referenced
> from anywhere else what is to stop the DoD run from freeing those
> before it freed the object ?
Putting my head out o
Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I may be missing something here. But within the resources of an object may
> be other PMCs. As those PMCs will not be referenced from anywhere else
> what is to stop the DoD run from freeing those before it freed the object ?
If the PMC has explicit knowle
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:05:34AM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I ask becasue what happens if an object actually wants
> > to use its contents during its DESTROY ?
>
> > For example Net::POP3::DESTROY will send a reset command to its
> > server if t
Graham Barr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I ask becasue what happens if an object actually wants
> to use its contents during its DESTROY ?
> For example Net::POP3::DESTROY will send a reset command to its
> server if the user did not call the quit method first. But how
> could it do this if the s
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:24:04PM -0400, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
> IIRC, DoD normally happens something vaguely like this:
>
>for my $p (@all_pmcs) {
> clear_is_live_flag($p);
>}
>our $traverse;
>sub set_is_live_flag($p) {
> if( !test_is_live_flag($p) and test_is_agre
