David Landgren wrote:
Thomas Klausner wrote:
[...]
The cpants analysis fails to recognise this as valid. What is it
looking for and/or could it be taught to look for this? I thought
that it was only looking for a string eval of "use Test::Pod".
It does, but the qq{} you're using isn't reco
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 09:30:03PM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
Yeah, but I'm loathe to dedicate two separate test files merely to score
two points of Kwalitee. As it is, I'd just much rather bundle both tests
in a 00_basic.t file along with all the other standard
Thomas Klausner wrote:
[...]
The cpants analysis fails to recognise this as valid. What is it looking
for and/or could it be taught to look for this? I thought that it was
only looking for a string eval of "use Test::Pod".
It does, but the qq{} you're using isn't recognised by the regex. I'l
Hi!
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 09:30:03PM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
> Yeah, but I'm loathe to dedicate two separate test files merely to score
> two points of Kwalitee. As it is, I'd just much rather bundle both tests
> in a 00_basic.t file along with all the other standard no-brainer tests.
I
Hi!
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:48:02AM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
> Seriously though, I have a module whose test suite includes Test::Pod
> and Test::Pod::Coverage, except that I use the following construct:
>
> SKIP: {
> skip( 'Test::Pod not installed on this system', 1 )
> unles
Hi!
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 12:24:26PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> > The cpants analysis fails to recognise this as valid. What is it
> > looking for and/or could it be taught to look for this? I thought that
> > it was only looking for a string eval of "use Test::Pod".
>
> I would like to know the sam
David Landgren wrote:
Yeah, but I'm loathe to dedicate two separate test files merely to score
two points of Kwalitee. As it is, I'd just much rather bundle both tests
in a 00_basic.t file along with all the other standard no-brainer tests.
One option is just to forget about the two points of
Andrew Savige wrote:
I based mine on the Test::Pod::Coverage docs:
use Test::More;
eval "use Test::Pod::Coverage 1.00";
plan skip_all => "Test::Pod::Coverage 1.00 required for testing POD coverage"
if $@;
all_pod_coverage_ok();
and scored the coverage kwalitee point...
Yeah, but I'm loat
--- David Landgren wrote:
> Seriously though, I have a module whose test suite includes Test::Pod
> and Test::Pod::Coverage, except that I use the following construct:
>
> SKIP: {
> skip( 'Test::Pod not installed on this system', 1 )
> unless do {
> eval qq{ use Test::P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Sunday 18 September 2005 11:48, David Landgren wrote:
> Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
> > http://cpants.perl.org
>
> Ooh! my kwalitee improved :) except other people's kwalitee imp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Sunday 18 September 2005 10:29, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
> http://cpants.perl.org
>
> Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
> suggestions/help with 'h
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
http://cpants.perl.org
Ooh! my kwalitee improved :) except other people's kwalitee improved
more than mine :(
Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
suggestions/help wi
Hi!
Data using the new metric 'has_changelog' is now available from
http://cpants.perl.org
Thanks again to Adam Kennedy, H.Merijn Brand and Smylers for various
suggestions/help with 'has_changelog'.
I've also added suggestions to improve ones kwalitee. For each metric I
wrote up a short 'remedy'
13 matches
Mail list logo
