Re: C static analysis on rakudo sources

2016-10-17 Thread Timo Paulssen
Yup! https://scan.coverity.com/projects/paultcochrane-moarvm

Re: C static analysis on rakudo sources

2016-10-16 Thread Michael Franz
BTW http://www.coverity.com/press-releases/press_story54_01_08_08/ From: Tobias Leich Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 3:05:36 AM To: Dmitry Karasik; perl6-compi...@perl.org Subject: Re: C static analysis on rakudo sources Hi, I removed the obvious false

Re: C static analysis on rakudo sources

2016-10-16 Thread Tobias Leich
Hi, I removed the obvious false-positives from the list. I'll open tickets by categroy of the errors. Thank you very much! Am 15.10.2016 um 17:26 schrieb Dmitry Karasik: Dear all, I've had access to a of C/C++ static analysis tool PVS Studio, and ran it against the latest rakudo sources [1]

C static analysis on rakudo sources

2016-10-15 Thread Dmitry Karasik
Dear all, I've had access to a of C/C++ static analysis tool PVS Studio, and ran it against the latest rakudo sources [1]. The majority of notes seems to be noise, but there were found some valid concerns (or at least looking valid to me) f.ex. this: MoarVM/3rdparty/dynasm/dasm_x86.h:125 r