Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can't really implement C-- on top of C efficiently, because of
> (a) tail calls and (b) the runtime interface for garbage collection,
> exception handling etc.
Agreed. But any practical C-- implementation will start with a C/C++
compiler so tha
Subject: Re: C# (.NET) has no interpreters
|
|
| On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 09:32:10AM -0400,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:30:23PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| > > > I'd prefer us to
