Re: Building a Fedora package

2006-07-11 Thread Steven Pritchard
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:01:19PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote: > First, there is a hardcoded "lib" somewhere that I can't seem to find. OK, I finally found the (last, I hope) problem. In tools/dev/install_files.pl, there is this line: $dest =~ s/^runtime/lib/; I may have gone overboa

Re: Building a Fedora package

2006-07-10 Thread Steven Pritchard
On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 01:16:47AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > When you say, "On x86_64" I think what your really mean is a "x86_64 > system with multilib support". Right. > You are correct that the current build system does not support > multilib builds or installs (or at least it didn't the

Re: Building a Fedora package

2006-07-09 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:01:19PM -0500, Steven Pritchard wrote: > First, there is a hardcoded "lib" somewhere that I can't seem to find. > On x86_64, libraries should get dropped in /usr/lib64, but "make > install" never creates /usr/lib64/parrot. Pointers on how to override > that would be grea

Building a Fedora package

2006-07-08 Thread Steven Pritchard
I've been working on building Fedora Extras packages for parrot and pugs off and on for the last couple of weeks. I have something that works fine on i386, but on x86_64 there are two issues. First, there is a hardcoded "lib" somewhere that I can't seem to find. On x86_64, libraries should get dr