On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 07:34:22PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> Steve Fink:
> > The assembler needs to be taught about the PMC constants:
>
> I disagree. Once you start adding assembler functions to make it easier
> for humans to use, you won't stop. I consider the assembler a tool for
> machine
Steve Fink:
> The assembler needs to be taught about the PMC constants:
I disagree. Once you start adding assembler functions to make it easier
for humans to use, you won't stop. I consider the assembler a tool for
machines to use. But if you want to do it, here's a patch.
--- newasm~ Mon A
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 10:08:01PM -0400, Jeff wrote:
> And a long time coming...
>
> An assembler supporting keyed aggregates. Because of the current lack of
> macro support (that will be added in a few days), it's not built by
> default and isn't invoked in the test suite.
Yay! Thank you.
> S
And a long time coming...
An assembler supporting keyed aggregates. Because of the current lack of
macro support (that will be added in a few days), it's not built by
default and isn't invoked in the test suite.
To build the new assembler, type 'make newasm'. All this target really
does is run t
The included patch requires a new file t/op/exceptions.t, which tests basic exception
handling, in this case divide-by-zero.
Patch was generated against latest CVS, but it shouldn't matter -that- much.
-Jeff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --recursive -C 2 parrot_cvs/MANIFEST parrot/MANIFEST
*** pa
