Re: [PATCH] Re: Arrays of PMCs

2002-04-26 Thread Jeff
Simon Cozens wrote: > > Steve Fink: > > EVENTUAL CURRENT > > set I0, P0[7] get_keyed I0, P0, 7 > > set P0[7], I0 set_keyed P0, 7, I0 > > set P0[0], P1[1]not possible > > set I0, P0[P1] not possible -- I'm not even sure what this will do > > set P1,

Re: [PATCH] Re: Arrays of PMCs

2002-04-24 Thread Simon Cozens
Steve Fink: > EVENTUAL CURRENT > set I0, P0[7] get_keyed I0, P0, 7 > set P0[7], I0 set_keyed P0, 7, I0 > set P0[0], P1[1]not possible > set I0, P0[P1] not possible -- I'm not even sure what this will do > set P1, P0[7] get_keyed P1, P0, 7 (

Re: [PATCH] Re: Arrays of PMCs

2002-04-24 Thread Piers Cawley
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:40:09PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: >> Does anyone have an idea of when we're going to see these? Or hashes >> of PMCs, I don't really care which... > > Well, we don't have hashes of

Re: [PATCH] Re: Arrays of PMCs

2002-04-23 Thread Steve Fink
Oops, forgot to change the subject line. No patch. Patch already committed.

[PATCH] Re: Arrays of PMCs

2002-04-23 Thread Steve Fink
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:40:09PM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote: > Does anyone have an idea of when we're going to see these? Or hashes > of PMCs, I don't really care which... Well, we don't have hashes of anything. We already have arrays of PMCs. You just can't get the PM

Arrays of PMCs

2002-04-23 Thread Piers Cawley
Does anyone have an idea of when we're going to see these? Or hashes of PMCs, I don't really care which... -- Piers "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite." -- Jane Austen?