s now almost unusable
due to the pace of change.
Yes. That's why I'm asking :-) I can start looking to apocalypses and
exegesis to have an idea of the structure and content, but not really
write them. I would need a running prototype, too. And that's more
difficult to find :
(for those that haven't seen this yet)
On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 01:05:52AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> I think the chapter on the Perl design philosophy is definitely worth
> the reading of. I just wish the book had wider margins so I can make
Alan Burlison has the scoop on an entire book on the
Iain Truskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões [15 Aug 2003 00:36]:
>> On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:19, Iain Truskett wrote:
> [...]
>> > Much like "Perl 6 Essentials" then?
>> >
>> > I must say that its chapter 4 is the clearest look at
>> > the perl 6 syntax (as it was a
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:52:42PM +0100, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
> Apocalypses and Exegesis are not an 'official' specification for Perl6,
> I mean, they are subject to change. Is there any idea when will we have
> a freeze on the syntax and features for perl6
> Apocalypses and Exegesis are not an 'official' specification for Perl6,
> I mean, they are subject to change. Is there any idea when will we have
> a freeze on the syntax and features for perl6?
Since the A/E gig is where the design team is getting a handle on what it
is th
Hi
Apocalypses and Exegesis are not an 'official' specification for Perl6,
I mean, they are subject to change. Is there any idea when will we have
a freeze on the syntax and features for perl6?
Thanks,
Alberto
write at least one more Apocalypse :)
Cheers,
Alberto
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 13:52, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2003, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Apocalypses and Exegesis are not an 'official' specification for Perl6,
> > I me
's why I'm asking :-) I can start looking to apocalypses and
exegesis to have an idea of the structure and content, but not really
write them. I would need a running prototype, too. And that's more
difficult to find :)
* Jonathan Scott Duff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15 Aug 2003 00:16]:
[...]
> Besides you could always provide online updates to your book as the
> language changes. The first (dead tree) edition would be the rough
> cut, and later editions would be closer to reality as the language
> stablizes.
Much li
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:19:28AM +1000, Iain Truskett wrote:
> * Jonathan Scott Duff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15 Aug 2003 00:16]:
>
> [...]
> > Besides you could always provide online updates to your book as the
> > language changes. The first (dead tree) edition would be the rough
> > cut, and late
On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:19, Iain Truskett wrote:
> * Jonathan Scott Duff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15 Aug 2003 00:16]:
>
> [...]
> > Besides you could always provide online updates to your book as the
> > language changes. The first (dead tree) edition would be the rough
> > cut, and later editions wo
Based on current experience, I'd say about three years after the start
of development for perl7.
=Austin
--- Alberto Manuel Brandão_Simões <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Apocalypses and Exegesis are not an 'official' specification for
> Perl6,
> I mean,
I wrote a Perl 6 chapter for a book in December and it is now almost unusable
> > due to the pace of change.
>
> Yes. That's why I'm asking :-) I can start looking to apocalypses and
> exegesis to have an idea of the structure and content, but not really
> write them. I w
* Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões [15 Aug 2003 00:36]:
> On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:19, Iain Truskett wrote:
[...]
> > Much like "Perl 6 Essentials" then?
> >
> > I must say that its chapter 4 is the clearest look at
> > the perl 6 syntax (as it was at the time of writing)
> > that I've seen yet.
> Ye
o the pace of change.
Yes. That's why I'm asking :-) I can start looking to apocalypses and
exegesis to have an idea of the structure and content, but not really
write them. I would need a running prototype, too. And that's more
difficult to find :)
I add a hearty "Amen"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alberto Manuel Brandão simões) writes:
> The question is simple, and Dan can have the same problem (or him or
> Larry). I am thinking on a Perl 6 book in portuguese (maybe only a
> tutorial... but who knows). But that means I must write something which
> will work :-)
Just a hin
On 14 Aug 2003, Alberto Manuel Brandão Simões wrote:
> Hi
>
> Apocalypses and Exegesis are not an 'official' specification for Perl6,
> I mean, they are subject to change. Is there any idea when will we have
> a freeze on the syntax and features for perl6?
Sometime
17 matches
Mail list logo
