[perl #43507] [BUG] yet another gc bug exposed by perl6 on windows

2008-03-17 Thread Ronald Blaschke via RT
I don't see this with Windows XP, VC++ 8.0, VC++ 9.0 or MinGW GCC 3.4.2, using Parrot r26446. All three nmake/mingw32-make test in languages/perl6 report: All tests successful. Files=27, Tests=223, 37 wallclock secs ( 0.13 usr + 0.00 sys = 0.13 CPU) Result: PASS The GC bug is either solved or

[perl #43507] [BUG] yet another gc bug exposed by perl6 on windows

2007-07-03 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay # Please include the string: [perl #43507] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43507 > from languages/perl6: ../../parrot perl6.pbc t/01-sanity/07-range.t causes a segfault d

Re: [perl #43507] AutoReply: [BUG] yet another gc bug exposed by perl6 on windows

2007-07-03 Thread jerry gay
On 7/3/07, Parrot via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings, This message has been automatically generated in response to the creation of a parrotbug regarding: "[BUG] yet another gc bug exposed by perl6 on windows" There is no need to reply to this message right n

Re: Another GC bug

2004-01-22 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:10 PM +0100 1/22/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: I have converted that one now into a static constant string, but this isn't a solution. We have discussed already a few times, what to do with such constant strings, e.g. declare them static with some macro tricks or use a string hash. We need a

Another GC bug

2004-01-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Running parrot built with --gc=libc works fine, all tests pass *except* t/pmc/pmc_62 when --gc-debug is set. I could track this down until here: classes/default.c: static void check_set_std_props(Parrot_Interp interp, PMC *pmc, STRING *key, PMC *value) { if (!string_compare(interp, key, str

Re: [perl #19143] Another GC bug?

2002-12-15 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Simon Glover (via RT) wrote: iii) Since there's no properties hash, a new PerlHash is created. v) The key is (erroneously) placed on the free list; at this point, the only flag it has set is the PObj_on_free_list_FLAG Hope this analysis is useful, It is really, thanks. (Hopefully)

[perl #19143] Another GC bug?

2002-12-14 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Simon Glover # Please include the string: [perl #19143] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=19143 > I've managed to track down the cause of the failure of at least one of the properties