Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Oct 9, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later.
> ...
> > Not a huge task, we just need to order PMCs before dest
Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 9, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>...
>> Not a huge task, we just need to order PMCs before destroying them,
> ..., but there isn't a way to
> ask a mark() method to set another flag. This leaves me stuck with
> regard to PMCs with custom ma
On Oct 9, 2003, at 8:43 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later.
...
Not a huge task, we just need to order PMCs before destroying them, to
make sure we don't call the destructor for
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:
> On October 9, 2003 09:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > > > loo
Thomas Fjellstrom writes:
> On October 9, 2003 09:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > > > looks like we need to g
On October 9, 2003 09:57 am, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > > looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than late
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> > looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later. So, this is
> > a good chance for someone to burn tho
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 11:43:41AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
> looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later. So, this is
> a good chance for someone to burn those surplus SAN points and become one
> with the gr
We've got ordered destruction on the big list 'o things to do, and it
looks like we need to get that done sooner rather than later. So, this is
a good chance for someone to burn those surplus SAN points and become one
with the great gibbering chaos at the center of the universe (no, wait,
that's no
