Re: A new AL, take 2

2000-09-14 Thread Ben Tilly
Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > >Ben Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Well I sat down, thought carefully about it, and reorganized > >my proposed license along the same lines that I would organize > >a config file. Instead of enumerating what is allowed, deny > >this, deny that, deny the other, all

Re: A new AL, take 2

2000-09-14 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
Ben Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Well I sat down, thought carefully about it, and reorganized >my proposed license along the same lines that I would organize >a config file. Instead of enumerating what is allowed, deny >this, deny that, deny the other, allow everything else. I >think that

Re: A new AL, take 2

2000-09-14 Thread Ben Tilly
I wrote: > >Well I sat down, thought carefully about it, and reorganized >my proposed license along the same lines that I would organize >a config file. Instead of enumerating what is allowed, deny >this, deny that, deny the other, allow everything else. I >think that this is a good way to rewri

A new AL, take 2

2000-09-13 Thread Ben Tilly
Well I sat down, thought carefully about it, and reorganized my proposed license along the same lines that I would organize a config file. Instead of enumerating what is allowed, deny this, deny that, deny the other, allow everything else. I think that this is a good way to rewrite it. It means