Re: .HL_language pragma (was: Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.)

2005-03-07 Thread MrJoltCola
At 07:50 AM 3/7/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:01 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> 4.1.1) implement a language pragma in assembler, e.g.: >> >> .HL_language Python Sounds good to me except that I would prefer you remove the HL_ and

.HL_language pragma (was: Proposed steps towards the next release 0.2 and beyond.)

2005-03-07 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Roger Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:01 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >> 4.1.1) implement a language pragma in assembler, e.g.: >> >> .HL_language Python > A pragma like that seems to split high-level languages into two groups: > those that are specially known to p