Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-09 Thread Michal Wallace
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote: > At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote: > >On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote: > > > My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need > > > ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all > > > variables

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-09 Thread Melvin Smith
At 02:00 PM 2/9/2004 -0500, Michal Wallace wrote: On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote: > My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we don't need > ability to have keywords as variables. Compilers can generate all > variables with names like $T01JHGJ_001 That can make it kind of nas

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-09 Thread Michal Wallace
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Melvin Smith wrote: > At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote: > >Melvin: > > > >Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you: > >int main () { > >> int if = 1; > >> > >> if (if) { > >> if = 0; > >> } > >>} > > My take on it is, since it is an intermediate language, we

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-09 Thread Melvin Smith
At 07:26 PM 2/5/2004 -0500, Will Coleda wrote: Melvin: Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you: int main () { int if = 1; if (if) { if = 0; } } do you have a patch? I think its a nice to have so If you sourself provide a nice patch guess it would be applied :) I thought I replied to this

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-05 Thread Will Coleda
Melvin: Here's a warnocked imcc issue for you: http://bugs6.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=24251 I don't have a suggested patch, sorry. Regards. On Sunday, February 1, 2004, at 04:42 PM, Stephane Peiry wrote: On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 01:42, Will Coleda wrote: 24251 - warnocked I don't like

Re: Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-05 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote: > Try > cd languages/perl6 > ./perl6 --force-grammar -e 1 # don't worry if it fails > make test $ ./perl6 --force-grammar -e 1 error:imcc:fixup_bsrs: couldn't find addr of sub '_main' Error: '/home/doughera/src/parrot/parrot-andy/parrot -r __eval_

Re: Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-04 Thread Steve Fink
Andrew Dougherty wrote: On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote: On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error 1 years Keep this one open. The tests still fail. How recentl

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-04 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Steve Fink wrote: > On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error > >1 years > > > > Keep this one open. The tests still fail. > > How recently did you check? I

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-04 Thread Steve Fink
On Feb-02, Andrew Dougherty wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 19184 languages/perl6/t/rx/call test error > 1 years > > Keep this one open. The tests still fail. How recently did you check? I committed a reimplementation of perl6 regexes abou

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-02 Thread Andrew Dougherty
On Sat, 1 Feb 2004, Stephane Peiry wrote: > Hi All, > > Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the > requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email > address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these > as obsolete (unless they are

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 23039 [PATCH] event handling-2 A similar patch is in, either applied or obsolete and resolved. > 16300 [BUG] hash clone hangs > 17158 [PACTH] reduce size of core_ops_prederef.* by a fair amount > 17244 [PACTH] hash ops at runtime for op_code() looku

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-02-02 Thread Andy Bussey
--- Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the > requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email > address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these > as obsolete (unless they are obvio

Re: RT Cleanup

2004-01-31 Thread Stephane Peiry
Hi All, Attached here is a list with old entries in RT where you can see the requestor (email address), ticket number, description. If your email address is in there, please give an update or I'll go flagging these as obsolete (unless they are obviously resolved, "patch applied" or else ;) Thanks