Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What needs to be done before making it the default? I'm anxious to
> remove CALL__BUILD=1 from my parrot alias.
Waiting for famous final words by our big cheese...
leo
On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 01:49, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> >> This initializer is available as first param in the init method.
> > I'm happy with this.
> Good.
What needs to be done before making it the default? I'm anxious to
remove CALL__BUILD=1 from my parrot alias.
> We don't have it yet. We cou
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 04:56, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>
>> new Pobj, Iclass, PInit
>>
>> This initializer is available as first param in the init method.
> I'm happy with this.
Good.
> ... A similar scheme will work nicely for
> deconstructors.
> (I loo
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 04:56, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I've put in the new scheme for initializer calls.
> To test it, set the environment variable "CALL__BUILD" to some value.
>
> Sample code to set an initializer to "_new"
>
> new P10, .PerlString
> set P10, "_new"
> newclass P1,
I've put in the new scheme for initializer calls.
To test it, set the environment variable "CALL__BUILD" to some value.
Sample code to set an initializer to "_new"
new P10, .PerlString
set P10, "_new"
newclass P1, "Foo"
setprop P1, "BUILD", P10
The BUILD initializer is called for a
