Sam Vilain wrote:
Is it intended that if languages need to make changes to the behaviour
of existing obejcts through their type, that something may follow up
after this and replace the old objects with objects of the new type?
Yes. Some languages will want that behavior, and some won't, so Par
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (When you extend an existing class, it actually creates
> +a new class, that replaces the old class in the Namespace, but the old
> +class can't be thrown away if it has objects instantiated in it. The old
> +objects still point to the old class and do their method resolu
Author: allison
Date: Sat Mar 3 13:43:38 2007
New Revision: 17312
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd15_objects.pod
Log:
[pdd]: Adding some notes on class registries to objects PDD. jonathan++
Modified: trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd15_objects.pod
