Re: [svn:parrot] r25412 - trunk/src/ops

2008-02-01 Thread chromatic
On Friday 01 February 2008 15:41:34 Andy Lester wrote: > > Any reason not to write: > > > > PMC *result = PMC_IS_NULL(lex_pad) ? NULL : VTABLE...; > No reason in my book, but I got a general anti-ternary vibe in the > past from the p2 crew. Anything that gets us an extra const *and* limits t

Re: [svn:parrot] r25412 - trunk/src/ops

2008-02-01 Thread Andy Lester
Any reason not to write: PMC *result = PMC_IS_NULL(lex_pad) ? NULL : VTABLE...; This assignment seems like a simple case, and you get a nice const opportunity for free. No reason in my book, but I got a general anti-ternary vibe in the past from the p2 crew. -- Andy Lester =>

Re: [svn:parrot] r25412 - trunk/src/ops

2008-02-01 Thread chromatic
On Friday 01 February 2008 15:34:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: petdance > Date: Fri Feb 1 15:34:35 2008 > New Revision: 25412 > > Modified: >trunk/src/ops/var.ops > > Log: > consting > > Modified: trunk/src/ops/var.ops > --- trunk/src/ops/var.ops (original) > +++ trunk/src/ops/va