[perl #68024] [TODO] Make &infix:($op) work

2015-10-19 Thread Tobias Leich via RT
The design docs indicate that square brackets need to be used, which works with rakudo: constant $foo="+"; say &infix:[$foo](3, 4) rakudo-moar 4b1df7: OUTPUT«7␤» So, this is closable with test?

[perl #68024] [TODO] Make &infix:($op) work

2013-03-29 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Mon Sep 19 20:55:21 2011, coke wrote: > On Tue Mar 30 08:24:48 2010, moritz wrote: > > The &infix:{$foo} form is now gone from the spec, but &infix:($foo) > > should work, afaict. > > 23:54 < [Coke]> rakudo: my $foo="+";&infix:($foo)(3,4).say > 23:54 <+p6eval> rakudo cbdd9b: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===

[perl #68024] [TODO] Make &infix:($op) work

2011-09-19 Thread Will Coleda via RT
On Tue Mar 30 08:24:48 2010, moritz wrote: > The &infix:{$foo} form is now gone from the spec, but &infix:($foo) > should work, afaict. 23:54 < [Coke]> rakudo: my $foo="+";&infix:($foo)(3,4).say 23:54 <+p6eval> rakudo cbdd9b: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Symbol '&infix:($foo)' not predecla

[perl #68024] [TODO] Make &infix:{$op} work

2009-07-30 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Geoffrey Broadwell # Please include the string: [perl #68024] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=68024 > Allow the name of an operator to be specified dynamically without using eval to ha