Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-12-15 Thread Moritz Lenz
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: > Is t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_char.t still failing for anyone? If > not, I'd like to close this ticket. It's fine here. Cheers, Moritz

[perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-12-15 Thread Patrick R. Michaud via RT
Is t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_char.t still failing for anyone? If not, I'd like to close this ticket. Pm

Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread Ovid
--- On Thu, 13/11/08, Mark J. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail > List of Failed > ---

Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 06:03:09PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote: > Now this test passes (r32629), but the Perl 6 test suite is still failing. > Now, however, I can't tell which test fails. > > Seems like the summary report should at least include counts of passed vs > failed tests. I assume

Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 06:03:09PM -0500, Mark J. Reed wrote: > > It would also help if the actual test output weren't overrun with "Use of > uninitialized value". Is that the result of bad tests or bad harness? In some cases it's bad tests -- i.e., tests that are using values of undef when the

Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread Mark J. Reed
I retract the previous comment. It was based on the file sent by Ovid; when I run make spectest myself, I get more informative output. In my case, 2 of the declaration-order tests are what's failing: Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed --

Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Now this test passes (r32629), but the Perl 6 test suite is still failing. > Now, however, I can't tell which test fails. Seems like the summary report should at least include counts of passed vs failed tests. I assume the resul

Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread Ovid
--- On Thu, 13/11/08, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Again, this is all with r32625, YMMV with other revisions > (and please > report whatever other clues you may find). Ah, sorry. I should have known better :) r32580 $ uname -a Darwin curtis-poes-computer-2.local 9.5.1 Darwin

Re: [perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:35:08PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (via RT) wrote: > t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo fails with: > > t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo (Wstat: 10 Tests: 170 Failed: 0) > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 240 tests but ran 170. > > However, it runs

[perl #60510] Bad plan: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo

2008-11-13 Thread curtis_ovid_...@yahoo.com (via RT)
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED] # Please include the string: [perl #60510] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60510 > t/spec/S29-conversions/ord_and_chr.rakudo fails with: t/spec/S29-conversions/ord