On Sat Nov 08 00:54:52 2008, ihrd wrote:
>
> sub foo (@a) { 1.say for @a }
> foo((1,2,3,4)); # only one 1
> foo([1,2,3,4]); # only one 1
> foo( my @a = 1,2,3 ); # only one 1
Now fixed as of r35392:
$ ./parrot perl6.pbc
> sub foo(@a) { 1.say for @a }
> foo((1,2,3,4));
1
1
1
Unfortunately I think this patch causes the following to fail:
sub foo($a) { 1.say for $a }
foo((1,2,3));
The problem is that simply looking at (misnamed) Perl6Scalar and
deciding what to do is a little coarse-grained. The real problem is in
the argument binding to a scalar versus array
On Sat Nov 08 09:32:09 2008, pmichaud wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:54:52AM -0800, Ilya Belikin wrote:
> > sub foo (@a) { 1.say for @a }
> > foo((1,2,3,4)); # only one 1
> > foo([1,2,3,4]); # only one 1
> > foo( my @a = 1,2,3 ); # only one 1
> >
> > This one really pesky bug :(
>
Thank you, very much!
2008/11/26 Moritz Lenz via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat Nov 08 09:32:09 2008, pmichaud wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:54:52AM -0800, Ilya Belikin wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > sub foo (@a) { 1.say for @a }
>> > foo((1,2,3,4)); # only one 1
>> > foo([1,2,3,4]
On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 12:54:52AM -0800, Ilya Belikin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> sub foo (@a) { 1.say for @a }
> foo((1,2,3,4)); # only one 1
> foo([1,2,3,4]); # only one 1
> foo( my @a = 1,2,3 ); # only one 1
>
> This one really pesky bug :(
I suspect this appeared as a result of the r
# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin
# Please include the string: [perl #60404]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60404 >
Hi there,
sub foo (@a) { 1.say for @a }
foo((1,2,3,4)); # only one 1
foo([1,2,3,4
