On 2008 Aug 18, at 14:20, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
I'm going to mark this ticket as resolved for now, and we can
open new tickets if we determine that .perl really does need
to work on code objects. :-)
fwiw, last time I checked pugs output the AST or something silly like
that.
--
brando
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 05:07:23PM +0200, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (via RT) wrote:
> >
> > - Need a clarification of what .perl should return here
>
> Some discussions on if and how closures should be clonable via .perl:
> http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2008-07-31#i_417160
After r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (via RT) wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # Please include the string: [perl #58024]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58024 >
>
>
> - Need a clarification of what .per
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #58024]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58024 >
- Need a clarification of what .perl should return here
