On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:51:39AM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:40:12AM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> > r30155:
> > $ ./perl6 -e '//'
> > Syntax error at line 1, near "//"
> >
> > Could be something nicer, in line with "The empty pattern is now
> > illegal." from S05.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:40:12AM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
> # Please include the string: [perl #57770]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57770 >
>
>
> r30155:
> $ ./
Brandon (>), Carl (>>):
>> $ ./perl6 -e '//'
>> Syntax error at line 1, near "//"
>>
>> Could be something nicer, in line with "The empty pattern is now
>> illegal." from S05.
>
> But can that really be easily distinguished from the C operator?
Yes, I believe so. The C operator never occurs where
On 2008 Aug 10, at 9:40, Carl MXXsak (via RT) wrote:
r30155:
$ ./perl6 -e '//'
Syntax error at line 1, near "//"
Could be something nicer, in line with "The empty pattern is now
illegal." from S05.
But can that really be easily distinguished from the C operator?
--
brandon s. allbery [sola
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #57770]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57770 >
r30155:
$ ./perl6 -e '//'
Syntax error at line 1, near "//"
Could be something nicer, i
