Re: [perl #53990] [CAGE] [PATCH] warnings in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c

2008-05-15 Thread NotFound
I have seen now that the functions if'ed out by DO_LOOP_OPTIMIZATION are mentioned and proposed for deletion in #46291, this ticket can be merged with him or closed. -- Salu2

Re: [perl #53990] [CAGE] [PATCH] warnings in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c

2008-05-12 Thread Andy Lester
On May 12, 2008, at 3:11 AM, NotFound wrote: Maybe the solution is to avoid the problem, that is, put the declarations outside of the HEADERIZER block. What's the point of having static functions inside one? So that declaration and definition are always in sync. -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PRO

Re: [perl #53990] [CAGE] [PATCH] warnings in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c

2008-05-12 Thread NotFound
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Andy Lester via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This won't work because it modifies the sections in between HEADERIZER > BEGIN & END sections. As of this writing, there is no solution for this > problem. Maybe the solution is to avoid the problem, that is, put t

[perl #53990] [CAGE] [PATCH] warnings in compilers/imcc/optimizer.c

2008-05-11 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by NotFound # Please include the string: [perl #53990] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53990 > Hello. In recent revisions there are warning about unused static functions in compilers/imc