On Mi. 19. Mär. 2008, 07:38:36, pmichaud wrote:
> > On Thu Dec 13 17:47:05 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Implement a 'copy' assignment (at least until we get the 'copy'
> > > opcode -- see RT#47828).
The copy opcode has been added in r23917.
Can this ticket be resolved now?
Regards,
Ber
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 09:05:38AM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> On Mi. 19. Mär. 2008, 07:38:36, pmichaud wrote:
>
> > > On Thu Dec 13 17:47:05 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Implement a 'copy' assignment (at least until we get the 'copy'
> > > > opcode -- see RT#47828).
>
>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:26:21AM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> compilers/pct/src/PAST/Compiler.pir says:
>
> On Thu Dec 13 17:47:05 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Implement a 'copy' assignment (at least until we get the 'copy'
> > opcode -- see RT#47828).
>
> Now that the copy op is im
On Thu Dec 13 17:47:05 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:41:08 chromatic wrote:
>
> > Here's a first step. I added a stripped-down version of the code in RT
> > #48467 as a second test, and it fails for me with:
> >
> > set_pmc() not implemented in class 'Num'
>
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:41:08 chromatic wrote:
> Here's a first step. I added a stripped-down version of the code in RT
> #48467 as a second test, and it fails for me with:
>
> set_pmc() not implemented in class 'Num'
>
> I tried to debug it, but I have what they call "Stupid Fingers
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 12:35:19 Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> Task description:
>
> Add an opcode 'copy' to src/ops/set.ops. Similar to 'clone'.
>
> - It takes two PMC arguments
>
> - It calls VTABLE_morph on $1, and then VTABLE_assign on the two.
>
> - It needs to call VTABLE_type to get th
Task description:
Add an opcode 'copy' to src/ops/set.ops. Similar to 'clone'.
- It takes two PMC arguments
- It calls VTABLE_morph on $1, and then VTABLE_assign on the two.
- It needs to call VTABLE_type to get the type of the source PMC to pass
to 'morph' instead of calling $1->vtable->base_t
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
The opcode will be implemented by calling the 'morph' and 'assign'
vtable functions.
Just a note that there are a lot of the built-in types -- especially
the aggregate and subroutine types -- that don't currently have
implementations of 'assign'. This is why
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:03:38AM -0600, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:03:32AM -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
> > The 'copy' opcode is similar to 'clone' but it reuses the PMC header of
> > the destination register. It takes two PMC arguments.
> >
> > The opcode will be im
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:03:32AM -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
> The 'copy' opcode is similar to 'clone' but it reuses the PMC header of
> the destination register. It takes two PMC arguments.
>
> The opcode will be implemented by calling the 'morph' and 'assign'
> vtable functions.
Just a not
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #47828]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47828 >
The 'copy' opcode is similar to 'clone' but it reuses the PMC header of
the destinati
11 matches
Mail list logo
