On Thursday 10 July 2008 14:41:50 NotFound wrote:
> I changed the signature from PMC * to const PMC * in r29253, otherwise
> using it with const gives warings in C and fails in C++.
>
> What is the reason to have an interp parameter? Looks like an
> unnecessary overhead in a frequently used functi
I changed the signature from PMC * to const PMC * in r29253, otherwise
using it with const gives warings in C and fails in C++.
What is the reason to have an interp parameter? Looks like an
unnecessary overhead in a frequently used function.
--
Salu2
Applied with r29249. Thanks for your comments, chromatic++.
Ron
