Re: [perl #44213] docs/faq.pod - fix L pod abuse

# from Will Coleda via RT # on Friday 03 August 2007 01:40 pm: >Seems like a pretty straightforward patch, but isn't the L<> syntax >used currently proper? The L<> doesn't support "named" http:// links. from perlpod: ' L Links to an absolute URL. For example, L. But not

Re: [perl #44213] docs/faq.pod - fix L pod abuse

Will Coleda via RT wrote: > Seems like a pretty straightforward patch, but isn't the L<> syntax > used currently proper? Is there a particular pod reader we're trying > to make happy? I tripped over this recently too. >From perlpod: * "L" Links to an absolute URL. For example, "L

[perl #44213] docs/faq.pod - fix L pod abuse

Seems like a pretty straightforward patch, but isn't the L<> syntax used currently proper? Is there a particular pod reader we're trying to make happy?

[perl #44213] docs/faq.pod - fix L pod abuse

# New Ticket Created by Eric Wilhelm # Please include the string: [perl #44213] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=44213 > Index: docs/faq.pod ===