On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 04:18:04AM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> > On Fri Apr 27 09:36:50 2007, particle wrote:
> > > it seems that 'object' is a reserved word in imcc, it's a synonym for
> > > 'pmc'. it seems undocumented, and i don't see a reason for it--we
> > > already have a word
On Sep 9, 2007, at 7:18 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
On Fr. 27. Apr. 2007, 14:02:49, smash wrote:
On Fri Apr 27 09:36:50 2007, particle wrote:
it seems that 'object' is a reserved word in imcc, it's a synonym
for
'pmc'. it seems undocumented, and i don't see a reason for it--we
a
On Fr. 27. Apr. 2007, 14:02:49, smash wrote:
> On Fri Apr 27 09:36:50 2007, particle wrote:
> > it seems that 'object' is a reserved word in imcc, it's a synonym for
> > 'pmc'. it seems undocumented, and i don't see a reason for it--we
> > already have a word for 'pmc'.
>
> I removed 'object' f
hi,
related to this, I think that imcc also allows for built-in types as types.
such as ".local Array a" etc. (sorry can't check; don't have my own pc
around here, this is a public pc) (I added some notes about this and other
PIR cleanups in languages/PIR and I think also in compilers/pirc IIRC).
# New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
# Please include the string: [perl #42769]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42769 >
it seems that 'object' is a reserved word in imcc, it's a synonym for
'pmc'. it seems undoc
