On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:47:58PM +0200, Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
> Patrick R. Michaud schrieb:
> >>>related to this, I think that imcc also allows for built-in types as
> >>>types.
> >>>such as ".local Array a" etc. (sorry can't check; don't have my own pc
> >>>around here, this is a public pc
Patrick R. Michaud schrieb:
related to this, I think that imcc also allows for built-in types as
types.
such as ".local Array a" etc. (sorry can't check; don't have my own pc
around here, this is a public pc) (I added some notes about this and other
PIR cleanups in languages/PIR and I think also
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 10:38:11AM -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> On So. 29. Apr. 2007, 06:01:16, kjs wrote:
>
> In r21167 the keyword 'object', as a synonym of 'pmc', was removed from
> PIR.
> However the question from kjs remains to be answered:
>
> > related to this, I think that
On So. 29. Apr. 2007, 06:01:16, kjs wrote:
In r21167 the keyword 'object', as a synonym of 'pmc', was removed from
PIR.
However the question from kjs remains to be answered:
> related to this, I think that imcc also allows for built-in types as
types.
> such as ".local Array a" etc. (sorry can't
