On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 04:08:58PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2007 15:44, Steve Peters wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:51:54PM -0700, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
>
> > Sweeping dirt under the rug doesn't mean that the house has been cleaned
> > up. It means I've tur
On Thursday 29 March 2007 15:44, Steve Peters wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:51:54PM -0700, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
> Sweeping dirt under the rug doesn't mean that the house has been cleaned
> up. It means I've turned it into someone else's problem. I'd rather
> Parrot was solid and
Am Freitag, 30. März 2007 00:44 schrieb Steve Peters:
> Sweeping dirt under the rug doesn't mean that the house has been cleaned
> up.
It's not related to hiding other possible errors. Some warnings are just not
appropriate to the usage of the very code, and there are a lot of them.
leo
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:51:54PM -0700, Leopold Toetsch via RT wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2007 20:41 schrieb Nicholas Clark:
> > Getting parrot to build under -ansi -pedantic is left as an exercise to the
> > reader.
>
> By filtering other useless and/or nonsensical warnings - yes - else no.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 07:41:25PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:42:12AM -0700, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
>
> > > Anyway, it's worth noting that although one of functions actually
> > > doesn't
> > > return anything, it is documented as returning a PMC *. So either th
Am Mittwoch, 28. März 2007 20:41 schrieb Nicholas Clark:
> Getting parrot to build under -ansi -pedantic is left as an exercise to the
> reader.
By filtering other useless and/or nonsensical warnings - yes - else no.
leo - been there, done that
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 05:42:12AM -0700, Steve Peters via RT wrote:
> > Anyway, it's worth noting that although one of functions actually
> > doesn't
> > return anything, it is documented as returning a PMC *. So either the
> > documentation or the function is wrong in parrotobject.pmc and shoul
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 11:32, chromatic wrote:
> On Monday 26 March 2007 20:55, Steve Peters wrote:
> > A couple of functions in XX are trying to return values from void
> > functions. To some compilers, such as the standard HP-UX compilers, this
> > is a big no-no. The patch below fixes this p
On Monday 26 March 2007 20:55, Steve Peters wrote:
> A couple of functions in XX are trying to return values from void
> functions. To some compilers, such as the standard HP-UX compilers, this is
> a big no-no. The patch below fixes this problem.
Thanks, applied as r17791.
-- c
On Tue Mar 27 05:32:41 2007, doughera wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Steve Peters wrote:
>
> > # New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
> > # Please include the string: [perl #42110]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> > # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.h
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007, Steve Peters wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
> # Please include the string: [perl #42110]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42110 >
>
>
> A couple of functions in XX are
# New Ticket Created by Steve Peters
# Please include the string: [perl #42110]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=42110 >
A couple of functions in XX are trying to return values from void functions.
To some com
12 matches
Mail list logo
