Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
It's a test failure for unimplemented feature(s). There is already a
TODO ticket (bug #31178) that ruffly covers this. Can you make a case
for why it needs to be to tracked as a software defect?
A core dump is a software defect, an unac
Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 11:09:38AM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
>>Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
>>
>>>According to our records, your request regarding
>>> "[BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 t/pmc/io.t assert core dump"
>>>has been resolved.
>>
>>According to my records, it'
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 11:09:38AM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> > According to our records, your request regarding
> > "[BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 t/pmc/io.t assert core dump"
> > has been resolved.
>
> According to my records, it's a TODO test and therefore not qu
Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> According to our records, your request regarding
> "[BUG] Parrot 0.3.0 t/pmc/io.t assert core dump"
> has been resolved.
According to my records, it's a TODO test and therefore not quite
yet resolved :-)
> If you have any further questions or concerns, please r
