Joshua Hoblitt schrieb:
I should have added that this patch does s/behaviour/behavior/g. Which
brings up the issue of: which "English" are we using for docs?
That would be a question for Chip, or do we have a 'docs' pumkin?
I'll hold off on more doc patches until Chip weighs in o
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:58:16PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> For what it's worth, the Perl 5 policy is not to make UK English
> speakers write US English and vice versa. Consistency within a document
> is nice, though.
A quick survey of ./docs suggests that the UK spelling is fairly
consistently
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 03:47 -0700, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT wrote:
> > I should have added that this patch does s/behaviour/behavior/g. Which
> > brings up the issue of: which "English" are we using for docs?
> That would be a question for Chip, or do we have a 'docs' pumkin?
For what it's w
> > This patch fixes a few typos, 81 char lines, and makes a couple of other
> > exceedingly minor tweaks.
Thanks applied in r9136.
> I should have added that this patch does s/behaviour/behavior/g. Which
> brings up the issue of: which "English" are we using for docs?
That would be a questio
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Hoblitt
# Please include the string: [perl #37067]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=37067 >
This patch fixes a few typos, 81 char lines, and makes a couple of other
exceedingly
