RE: [perl #36620] Bug in editor/ops2vim.pl

2005-07-22 Thread Amir Karger
Oops, you'r right. perldoc perlop says is a nickname for <>, but it's not as magical. > -Original Message- > From: jerry gay via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 2:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [perl #

Re: [perl #36620] Bug in editor/ops2vim.pl

2005-07-21 Thread jerry gay
actually, it should be while(<>) { applied, thanks. On 7/21/05, via RT Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # New Ticket Created by Amir Karger > # Please include the string: [perl #36620] > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > # https://rt.perl.org/rt

[perl #36620] Bug in editor/ops2vim.pl

2005-07-21 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Amir Karger # Please include the string: [perl #36620] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36620 > editor/ops2vim.pl says: while (<@ARGV>) { AFAIK, that should be while () {