On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:45:54AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> Perhaps a better approach would be to perform a bit
> of static analysis on the grammar and look for left recursions at
> creation time (I believe that is a known problem). Then we can just
> warn once up front and go on our merry way
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:11:02AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> Patrick~
>
> The theoretical implementation of this is quite simple. Keep a
> counter. everytime a token is consumed from the input stream reset it.
> Every time a rule is followed increment the counter. If the counter
> is ever gre
Patrick~
On 10/10/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:45:54AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> > Perhaps a better approach would be to perform a bit
> > of static analysis on the grammar and look for left recursions at
> > creation time (I believe that is a kn
Patrick~
On 10/10/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:11:02AM -0400, Matt Fowles wrote:
> > Patrick~
> >
> > The theoretical implementation of this is quite simple. Keep a
> > counter. everytime a token is consumed from the input stream reset it.
> > Ev
Patrick~
On 10/9/05, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:55:44AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > > > What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
> > >
> > > My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
> > > most progra
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:55:44AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > > What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
> >
> > My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
> > most programs with infinite recursive loops is that they
> > eventually explode.
>
>
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 07:55:02PM -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 09:55:44AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > > > What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
> > >
> > > My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
> > > most progr
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 12:41:18PM -0700, Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:16:58PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
>
> My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:16:58PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> Guys,
>
> What is the status of this bug? Should this be a PGE todo item?
My opinion is that it's "not a bug" -- the normal behavior for
most programs with infinite recursive loops is that they
eventually explode. The orig
# New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
# Please include the string: [perl #36452]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36452 >
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:56:27PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
> Attempting to come
10 matches
Mail list logo
