Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-12 Thread Leopold Toetsch
chromatic wrote: There's Debian-specific stuff, but that's just Debian being charmingly itself. That should go away too. The canonical fix is to create the missing symlinks and probably submit patches to debian. leo

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-12 Thread jerry gay
i'm happy. close the ticket. On 12 Apr 2005 18:10:49 -, chromatic via RT < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 10:59 -0700, jerry gay wrote: > > > works! the win32-specific stuff can be ripped out of > > runtime/library/pcre.imc && SDL.imc. > > or i'll submit a patch if you'

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-12 Thread chromatic
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 10:59 -0700, jerry gay wrote: > works! the win32-specific stuff can be ripped out of > runtime/library/pcre.imc && SDL.imc. > or i'll submit a patch if you'd rather. There shouldn't be any Win32-specific stuff in SDL.imc now. (I don't see any.) There's Debian-specific

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-12 Thread jerry gay
On 12 Apr 2005 15:14:58 -, Leopold Toetsch via RT < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > jerry gay wrote: > > On 12 Apr 2005 09:44:08 -, Leopold Toetsch via RT < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>The question is, if the dynext loader should try to strip "^lib" off the > >>library name. > > >

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-12 Thread Leopold Toetsch
jerry gay wrote: On 12 Apr 2005 09:44:08 -, Leopold Toetsch via RT < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The question is, if the dynext loader should try to strip "^lib" off the library name. the convention on windows is not to include the "lib" prefix, however there are exceptions. Ok, let's try it.

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-12 Thread jerry gay
On 12 Apr 2005 09:44:08 -, Leopold Toetsch via RT < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jerry Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> > the attached patch gets the SDL library and examples running on > win32. > > Are there more Win32 libs that have the same naming conventions: > > unixish: win32:

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-12 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Jerry Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > the attached patch gets the SDL library and examples running on win32. Are there more Win32 libs that have the same naming conventions: unixish: win32: libSDL SDL The question is, if the dynext loader should try to stri

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-08 Thread jerry gay
urk. attached. On 8 Apr 2005 18:41:42 -, chromatic via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 11:06 -0700, jerry gay wrote:> the attached patch gets the SDL library and examples running on win32.> please test on existing platforms by applying and running>  .\parrot examples\sdl\blu

Re: [perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-08 Thread chromatic
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 11:06 -0700, jerry gay wrote: > the attached patch gets the SDL library and examples running on win32. > please test on existing platforms by applying and running > .\parrot examples\sdl\blue_rect.imc I don't see a patch in this mail or in RT. Can you re-send? -- c

[perl #34704] [PATCH] get SDL running on win32

2005-04-08 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by jerry gay # Please include the string: [perl #34704] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34704 > the attached patch gets the SDL library and examples running on win32. please test on exi