Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Francois PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I rename too the new script to mk_inno.pl > OK, without handling ICU, the patch is shorter. Thanks, applied. leo

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-06 Thread Francois PERRAD
At 09:50 06/04/2005 +, you wrote: François PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I rename too the new script to mk_inno.pl Sorry for bothering you again. But with the recent ICU changes, installing any ICU stuff is obsolete. ICU will be removed from the source tree soon (when we switch to SVN).

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-06 Thread Leopold Toetsch
François PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I rename too the new script to mk_inno.pl Sorry for bothering you again. But with the recent ICU changes, installing any ICU stuff is obsolete. ICU will be removed from the source tree soon (when we switch to SVN). > Francois Thanks, leo

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-05 Thread François PERRAD
At 10:32 04/04/2005 +0200, you wrote: François PERRAD wrote: I agree with you, 'win32-inno-installer' is a better target name than 'setup'. Do you want a new version of the patch with this name ? Yes please. I rename too the new script to mk_inno.pl Francois Thanks, leo diff -Nur parrot/README.wi

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-04 Thread François PERRAD
At 18:01 02/04/2005 +, you wrote: Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or even: > nmake win32-installer > ? > The Windows equivalent of "rpm" would be "msi". Maybe then: nmake win32-inno-installer I agree with you, 'win32-inno-installer' is a better target name than 'setup'. Do you w

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-03 Thread Ron Blaschke
Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Or even: >> nmake win32-installer >> ? >> The Windows equivalent of "rpm" would be "msi". > Maybe then: > nmake win32-inno-installer > nmake win32-msi-installer > ... > (which make the win32 prefix rather superfluent) I

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or even: > nmake win32-installer > ? > The Windows equivalent of "rpm" would be "msi". Maybe then: nmake win32-inno-installer nmake win32-msi-installer ... (which make the win32 prefix rather superfluent) > Ron leo

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-02 Thread Ron Blaschke
Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Francois PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I add a new target 'setup' in the main Makefile. >> That's allow the creation of a setup-parrot-x.y.z.exe ('standard' binary >> distribution) that contains all parrot install directories and the ICU >> shared libraries. > Shou

Re: [perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-04-02 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Francois PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I add a new target 'setup' in the main Makefile. > That's allow the creation of a setup-parrot-x.y.z.exe ('standard' binary > distribution) that contains all parrot install directories and the ICU > shared libraries. Shouldn't that better read: ma

[perl #34625] [PATCH] make setup on MSWin32

2005-03-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Francois PERRAD # Please include the string: [perl #34625] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34625 > I add a new target 'setup' in the main Makefile. That's allow the creation of a se