At 8:23 AM -0500 11/9/04, Matt Diephouse wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:14:28 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally. Code created through compile is currently not preserving
> registers. See yesterdays mail: "Q: eval". This needs some clarification
first and fixing.
There are
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:14:28 +0100, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two notes:
> Your compiler seems to emit subroutines all called "main".
Do all the subroutines need to have unique names if they get compiled
individually by IMCC? is there support for anonymous subs now?
> The compil
Matt Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After the new calling scheme was put in place, my Forth implementation
> started having some problems. I've stripped down and attached the files
> along with a trace. Here's the input/output:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/parrot/forth$ ../parrot forth.pir
T
# New Ticket Created by Matt Diephouse
# Please include the string: [perl #32369]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32369 >
After the new calling scheme was put in place, my Forth implementation
started hav
