Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-22 Thread Leopold Toetsch
mAsterdam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately the uppercased literals yield 0 instead of 42. Is already fixed in CVS. leo

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-21 Thread mAsterdam
Hm I should have run the test before I replied. I removed the negatives. Unfortunately the uppercased literals yield 0 instead of 42. use Parrot::Test tests => 1; output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "integer literals"); print 0x2A print "\n" print 0X2A print "\n"

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-20 Thread mAsterdam
Dan Sugalski wrote: Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 3:10 PM -0700 8/16/04, Danny Werner (via RT) wrote: Examples from the 2th aoudad book (page 127) did not turn out as expected. Being completely new to this, I did not know where to put the testcode. And now the

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:36 PM +0200 8/20/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 3:10 PM -0700 8/16/04, Danny Werner (via RT) wrote: Examples from the 2th aoudad book (page 127) did not turn out as expected. Being completely new to this, I did not know where to put the testcode. And n

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 3:10 PM -0700 8/16/04, Danny Werner (via RT) wrote: >>Examples from the 2th aoudad book (page 127) did not >>turn out as expected. Being completely new to this, >>I did not know where to put the testcode. > And now the test's in. Thanks! And fails with

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 3:10 PM -0700 8/16/04, Danny Werner (via RT) wrote: Examples from the 2th aoudad book (page 127) did not turn out as expected. Being completely new to this, I did not know where to put the testcode. And now the test's in. Thanks! -- Dan ---

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski wrote: print 0X2A Fixed. leo

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-20 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> print 0x2A >> print "\n" >> print 0X2A > > on this line. > Leo, any reason to be case sensitive on this stuff you can think of? Nah. Not really. The lexer evolves, as it did with float parsing. And all untested stuff doesn'

Re: [perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-20 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 3:10 PM -0700 8/16/04, Danny Werner (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Danny Werner # Please include the string: [perl #31197] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31197 > Hi bugtracker, Examples from the 2

[perl #31197] literal.t

2004-08-16 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Danny Werner # Please include the string: [perl #31197] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=31197 > Hi bugtracker, Examples from the 2th aoudad book (page 127) did not turn out as expe