Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Count: 4
> 0: 263958416
> 1: 0
> 2: 263958412
> 3: 264243256
And differently here. What your struct layout is describing was:
struct container {
int count;
int ar[2];
};
But you get from nci_p_ a pointer to:
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 22:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> > I'd like to be able to access pixels (an array of Uint32s) directly in
> > some cases.
> > + set P2[ 'i' ], .DATATYPE_PTR
> Why not just define an array of uintvals? The pointer type does nothing
> useful AFAIK.
It's true that the pointer
Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> typedef struct SDL_Surface {
> void *pixels; /* Read-write */
> ...
> }
> I'd like to be able to access pixels (an array of Uint32s) directly in
> some cases.
> + set P2[ 'i' ], .DATATYPE_PTR
Why not
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #29380]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29380 >
I have an array hanging off of a struct:
typedef struct SDL_Surface {
