Woolley Kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not a biggie, but here is a quick patch for ops.num that should stop
> the warnings about ops 1426 to 1432 not being mentioned there.
It's not really decided, if these opcodes are 'official'. So I'd rather
wait a bit before nailing down ops.num.
> Che
Woolley Kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not a biggie, but here is a quick patch for ops.num that should stop
> the warnings about ops 1426 to 1432 not being mentioned there.
It's not really decided, if these opcodes are 'official'. So I'd rather
wait a bit before nailing down ops.num.
> Che
# New Ticket Created by WOOLLEY kj
# Please include the string: [perl #29024]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=29024 >
Not a biggie, but here is a quick patch for ops.num that should stop
the warnings abou
