On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 20:51 -0800, Jerry Gay via RT wrote:
> i have a sneaking suspicion that this test no longer fails, but there
> are no smoke reports for ppc-linux for me to verify. is there someone
> with that cpu/arch combo who can produce a test result to either prove
> or disprove my claim
i have a sneaking suspicion that this test no longer fails, but there
are no smoke reports for ppc-linux for me to verify. is there someone
with that cpu/arch combo who can produce a test result to either prove
or disprove my claim?
~jerry
Joseph E. Sacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> t/pmc/signal# Failed test (t/pmc/signal.t at line 65)
The problem is very likely in the test itself. To verify that you could
run e.g. the first test[1] with a longer sleep and send a SIGHUP
# New Ticket Created by "Joseph E. Sacco, Ph. D."
# Please include the string: [perl #28995]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=28995 >
System:
* PPC with dual 533MHz G4 CPU's, 1GB RAM, SCSI disks
* Yellow Do
