On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:23:25AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
: At 11:01 PM -0500 3/25/04, Will Coleda wrote:
: >Would a patch be accepted that let split work on non empty strings
: >(not treated as REs) as a stopgap until RE support?
:
: Yep.
Especially since we'll be revising P6 split to do th
At 11:01 PM -0500 3/25/04, Will Coleda wrote:
Would a patch be accepted that let split work on non empty strings
(not treated as REs) as a stopgap until RE support?
Yep.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sug
Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's an untested patch to fix the split op's warning.
Thanks, applied.
leo
Would a patch be accepted that let split work on non empty strings (not
treated as REs) as a stopgap until RE support?
On Thursday, March 25, 2004, at 10:51 PM, Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #27962]
# in the subject line of
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #27962]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27962 >
Here's an untested patch to fix the split op's warning.
Index: ops/string.ops
===
