>Even if that works, PASM tests shouldn't be in t/src but in t/pmc/io.t.
Sorry, I didn't know that.
The attached patch is for t/pmc/io.t
>leo
Thanks,
Arvindh
biotests2.patch
Description: biotests2.patch
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the intended
recipie
Arvindh Rajesh Tamilmani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> name="biotests.patch"
Something is wrong with these tests: patching t/src/io.t and PASM code.
Even if that works, PASM tests shouldn't be in t/src but in t/pmc/io.t.
leo
>This is a test for the buffer bug that
>was discussed on p6i a few days ago.
>
>It does not remove the test file it makes
>because I do not know a good way to do this.
You may use teardown() defined in t/src/io.t
The attached patch contains stripped down versions of your program
that I used to s
Stefan Lidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ and yet another f'up ]
I've now comitted a fix for unmakeCOW not to turn off GC. So the test
runs fine now with limited memory. *But*:
Total memory allocated = 532480
DOD runs = 9680
Collect runs = 9660
Collect memory = 1388032592
^
Stefan Lidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ VM Panic ]
> SPLIT:
> substr S3, S1, 0, 1
> substr S1, 0, 1, ""
The mem_allocate happens to be triggered by above string_replace, which
does unmake_COW. During that GC is blocked, so we are allocating
increasing blocks of memory until the
Stefan Lidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> readline S1, P1
The implementation of readline looks rather bogus. It allocates a huge
(64K) string, sets that to zero, and the calls read, which calls
readline.
This is really suboptimal. It should probably call PIO_buf_readline or
such directl
Stefan Lidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a test for the buffer bug that
> was discussed on p6i a few days ago.
Thanks, fine.
> output_is(<<'CODE', < set S0, "buffTest"
> open P1, S0
open P1, S0, ">"
I don't know, if it should even write the test file w/o tha
# New Ticket Created by Stefan Lidman
# Please include the string: [perl #25129]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=25129 >
Hello
This is a test for the buffer bug that
was discussed on p6i a few days ago.
It
