On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Peter Sinnott wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:41PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> > Does anyone have an old enough Perl to test if this is still an issue?
> >
> > -J
> >
> > --
>
> parrot no longer supports perl 5.005
The -U flag to perdoc
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Peter Sinnott wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:43:02AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Peter Sinnott wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:41PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> > > > Does anyone have an old enough Perl to
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 01:43:02AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 11:31:17AM +0100, Peter Sinnott wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:41PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> > > Does anyone have an old enough Perl to test if this is still an issue?
> > >
> Prior to
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 08:43:41PM -0700, Joshua Hoblitt via RT wrote:
> Does anyone have an old enough Perl to test if this is still an issue?
>
> -J
>
> --
parrot no longer supports perl 5.005
(from lib/Parrot/Revision.pm )
package Parrot::Revision;
use strict;
use 5.006;
If I replace our
Does anyone have an old enough Perl to test if this is still an issue?
-J
--
