Re: [perl #22387] [PATCH] simple constant propagation

2003-06-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Shortly after trying to go to bed last night [this morning], I realized > a case (or class of cases) in which this would be broken. I will try to > hack at dealing with that later; however, I am still relatively new to > this. Is

Re: [perl #22387] [PATCH] simple constant propagation

2003-06-01 Thread Matt Fowles
Leopold Toetsch wrote: First thanks, seconds I modified and applied it - but third, its disabled and doesn't work and forth - it needs a lot of tests to really get activated. I did add some comments, and an example, why it will not work. I think its better, to have the midifed patch applied and lea

Re: [perl #22387] [PATCH] simple constant propagation

2003-06-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Matt Fowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch adds simple constant propagation to imcc. First thanks, seconds I modified and applied it - but third, its disabled and doesn't work and forth - it needs a lot of tests to really get activated. I did add some comments, and an example, why it wi

[perl #22387] [PATCH] simple constant propagation

2003-05-31 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Matt Fowles # Please include the string: [perl #22387] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # http://rt.perl.org/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=22387 > All~ This patch adds simple constant propagation to imcc. The tests for this level of